The conclusion of trademark examination determines whether a trademark is registered or not, and also determines the establishment of trademark rights and interests of an enterprise in a certain procedure. However,
Due to the objective reasons or the subjective reasons of the cognition level of trademark examiners, there may be different degrees of subjective and objective differences
Match the circumstances. In particular, due to the particularity of the case of trademark registration application review, it is impossible for the applicant to fully reflect in the application
The objective situation of its application, only after being rejected, has the opportunity to fully provide the trademark review and adjudication authority. Therefore, set up the rejection review process
The order is necessary for the relief of the rejected registered trademark application.
Where the trademark applicant has rejected the preliminary examination by the Trademark Office, and the applicant is not satisfied with the reasons for the rejection, the applicant shall receive the rejection
Within fifteen days from the date of the notification, the firm shall be entrusted to apply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review.
The applicant for review shall be the original applicant whose trademark application has been rejected by the Trademark Office, and the others shall not be eligible for review.
Once an application for trademark registration is filed with the Trademark Office, it goes through the legal procedure.
After passing the formal examination and entering the examination procedure, no modification can be made.
Trademark rejection review is the final confirmation of trademark confirmation, it is in the original "commodity registration application" based on the review, therefore, the review can not be
Make some changes to the trademark. If the applicant wants to modify the trademark, he shall file a new application for registration with the Trademark Office.
Applicant required materials:
1
Application for Reexamination of Rejected Trademark, Power of Attorney for Reexamination of Rejected Trademark
;
2
Covered by the Trademark Office
'
Turn down
'
The original of the Trademark Registration Application and the original of the Trademark Verification Notification
;
3
Relevant supporting materials and physical evidence
1
. Copy of business license of enterprise legal person (back with official seal)
2
. Trademark concept and usage (mainly prominence)
3
. Company profile
4
. The honors obtained by the company
5
. Sales, advertising expenses and related financial information of the company in the last three years.
6
. Original and photocopy of corporate media reports or picture advertisements
7
. Enterprise sales product appearance original and photocopy
8
. Other evidence and materials that can prove the company's products and popularity
9
. Evidence of the earliest use of the trademark
Note:
The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may, in accordance with the following principles, determine the probative power of several pieces of evidence submitted by the parties to the same fact
(1)
Official documents produced by state organs and other functional departments according to their functions and powers are superior to other documents;
(2)
Expert conclusions, archival materials and notarized or registered documentary evidence are superior to other documentary evidence, audio-visual materials and witness testimony;
(3)
Originals and originals are superior to copies and replicas;
(4)
The appraisal conclusion of the legal appraisal department is superior to that of other appraisal departments;
(5)
Original evidence is superior to transmitted evidence;
(6)
The testimony of other witnesses is superior to the testimony of the witnesses who have relatives or other intimate relations with the party in favor of the party;
(7)
The testimony of the witness who participated in the public review is superior to that of the witness who did not participate in the public review
;
(8)
Several different kinds of consistent evidence are better than one isolated piece of evidence.
① Application home page and body style (see this website book download)
The applicant must be the original trademark registration applicant rejected by the Trademark Office; A reply shall be submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice of rejection by the Trademark Office
Application for examination (if it is represented by an agency, the notice of rejection served on the trademark agency shall be deemed to have been served on the parties).
③ The parties fill in the application for review of rejected trademark registration application (home page) and rejected trademark registration application for review (text style)
Please read the instructions on the back carefully.
The conclusion of trademark examination determines whether a trademark is registered or not, and also determines the establishment of trademark rights and interests of an enterprise in a certain procedure. However,
Due to the objective reasons or the subjective reasons of the cognition level of trademark examiners, there may be different degrees of subjective and objective differences
Match the circumstances. In particular, due to the particularity of the case of trademark registration application review, it is impossible for the applicant to fully reflect in the application
The objective situation of its application, only after being rejected, has the opportunity to fully provide the trademark review and adjudication authority. Therefore, set up the rejection review process
The order is necessary for the relief of the rejected registered trademark application.
Where the trademark applicant has rejected the preliminary examination by the Trademark Office, and the applicant is not satisfied with the reasons for the rejection, the applicant shall receive the rejection
Within fifteen days from the date of the notification, the firm shall be entrusted to apply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for review.
The applicant for review shall be the original applicant whose trademark application has been rejected by the Trademark Office, and the others shall not be eligible for review.
Once an application for trademark registration is filed with the Trademark Office, it goes through the legal procedure.
After passing the formal examination and entering the examination procedure, no modification can be made.
Trademark rejection review is the final confirmation of trademark confirmation, it is in the original "commodity registration application" based on the review, therefore, the review can not be
Make some changes to the trademark. If the applicant wants to modify the trademark, he shall file a new application for registration with the Trademark Office.
Applicant required materials:
1
Application for Reexamination of Rejected Trademark, Power of Attorney for Reexamination of Rejected Trademark
;
2
Covered by the Trademark Office
'
Turn down
'
The original of the Trademark Registration Application and the original of the Trademark Verification Notification
;
3
Relevant supporting materials and physical evidence
1
. Copy of business license of enterprise legal person (back with official seal)
2
. Trademark concept and usage (mainly prominence)
3
. Company profile
4
. The honors obtained by the company
5
. Sales, advertising expenses and related financial information of the company in the last three years.
6
. Original and photocopy of corporate media reports or picture advertisements
7
. Enterprise sales product appearance original and photocopy
8
. Other evidence and materials that can prove the company's products and popularity
9
. Evidence of the earliest use of the trademark
Note:
The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may, in accordance with the following principles, determine the probative power of several pieces of evidence submitted by the parties to the same fact
(1)
Official documents produced by state organs and other functional departments according to their functions and powers are superior to other documents;
(2)
Expert conclusions, archival materials and notarized or registered documentary evidence are superior to other documentary evidence, audio-visual materials and witness testimony;
(3)
Originals and originals are superior to copies and replicas;
(4)
The appraisal conclusion of the legal appraisal department is superior to that of other appraisal departments;
(5)
Original evidence is superior to transmitted evidence;
(6)
The testimony of other witnesses is superior to the testimony of the witnesses who have relatives or other intimate relations with the party in favor of the party;
(7)
The testimony of the witness who participated in the public review is superior to that of the witness who did not participate in the public review
;
(8)
Several different kinds of consistent evidence are better than one isolated piece of evidence.
① Application home page and body style (see this website book download)
The applicant must be the original trademark registration applicant rejected by the Trademark Office; A reply shall be submitted within 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice of rejection by the Trademark Office
Application for examination (if it is represented by an agency, the notice of rejection served on the trademark agency shall be deemed to have been served on the parties).
③ The parties fill in the application for review of rejected trademark registration application (home page) and rejected trademark registration application for review (text style)
Please read the instructions on the back carefully.
The conclusion of trademark examination determines whether a trademark is registered or not, and also determines the establishment of trademark rights and interests of an enterprise in a certain procedure. However, due to the objective reasons or the subjective reasons of the cognition level of trademark examiners, there may be different degrees of subjective and objective inconsistency. In particular, due to the particularity of the case of trademark registration application review, it is impossible for the applicant to fully reflect the objective situation of its application in the application, and only after it is rejected, it has the opportunity to fully provide it to the trademark review and adjudication authority. Therefore, it is necessary to set up the procedure of rejection review for the relief of rejected registered trademarks. Where the trademark applicant has rejected the preliminary examination by the Trademark Office and refuses to accept the reasons for the rejection, the applicant shall, within fifteen days from the date of receipt of the notice of rejection, entrust our firm to apply to the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board for a review. The applicant for review shall be the original applicant whose trademark application has been rejected by the Trademark Office, and the others shall not be eligible for review. Once the trademark registration application is submitted to the Trademark Office, it enters the legal procedure, and cannot be modified after passing the formal examination and entering the examination procedure. Trademark rejection review is the final confirmation of trademark confirmation, it is in the original "Application for registration of goods" based on the review, therefore, the review can not be partially modified the trademark. If the applicant wants to modify the trademark, he shall file a new application for registration with the Trademark Office. Materials required by the applicant: 1, "Rejected trademark review Application", "Rejected review power of attorney"; 2. The original of the Application for Trademark Registration and the original of the Notice of Trademark Verification with the "rejection" seal of the Trademark Office; 3. Relevant supporting materials and physical evidence 1. Copy of business license of enterprise legal person (back with official seal) 2. Design and use of the trademark (mainly prominence) 3. Company Profile 4. Honors obtained by the company 5. Sales, advertising expenses and related financial information of the company in the last three years. 6. Original and photocopy of corporate media report or picture advertisement 7. Enterprise sales product appearance original and photocopy 8. Other evidence and materials that can prove the company's products and popularity 9. Note: The Trademark Review and Adjudication Board may determine the probative power of several evidences submitted by parties to the same fact in accordance with the following principles: (1) Official documents made by state organs and other functional departments in accordance with their functions and powers are superior to other documents; (2) Appraisal conclusions, archival materials and notarized or registered documentary evidence are superior to other documentary evidence, audio-visual materials and witness testimony; (3) originals and originals are superior to copies and replicas; (4) the appraisal conclusion of the statutory appraisal department is superior to the appraisal conclusion of other appraisal departments; (5) Original evidence is superior to transmitted evidence; (6) the testimony of other witnesses is superior to that of witnesses who are related to the party or have other intimate relations with the party; (7) The testimony of witnesses who participated in the public review is superior to that of witnesses who did not participate in the public review; (8) Several different kinds of consistent evidence are better than one isolated piece of evidence.
Lu Public network security No. 37130202371663