Food company-20Be from'09 documentary directed by Robert Kenner Free edit Modified meaningSet Xian Wei cold township need to take sixItem name

Food company(3 in totallifeZhang)With the high development of industrial civilization, eachAncestral achievementsAll kinds of food are also in short supply, but behind this seeming prosperity, food safety has reached a point that cannot be ignored. The film starts with the fast food industryStep to the planting industry, animal husbandry, aquaculture extensionThe drive revealed that big food company managers were willing to change their practices in order to make high profitsThe way things grow and growThey make huge profits in their operations at the expense of public health and safety. Add in seemingly clean foodOn the assembly line, SamanaBacillus and E. coliBacteria infiltrate food without hindranceAmong them, poison the human raceGuard but suck friends rightThe life. Due to policy etcFace the reason, people can not and powerlessReject the persecution imposed by big corporations. In the face of money and desire, we destroy ourselves...[1]

References [2]

photographerquasi-errormethod

Food company(3 photos in total)The film was filmed through interviews with experts such as Eric Schlawse("Fast food kingdomThe author ofMichael Pollan(Author of The Omnivore's Dilemma)directorialmilliOpinion. Then there's the conversation with social entrepreneurs to show some forward thinking, like Gary Hirschberg of yogurt company Stonyfield, based in Shenandoah Valley, Virginia, PoJoe Sa of lyface FarmsLatin. Food Insider reveals eatingRemove the foot and draw the SueShocking truths about the food industry, including what people eatBy mistakeHow it's produced, and some of the problems the country needs to face.[6]

The packaging of some food products in the United States is printed with the pattern of livestock nibbling in green pastures, which makes people feel that the food origin is natural, sanitary and free from industrial pollution. But, "Food, Inc." tells viewers, this is an illusion. The film tells the audience that the livestock industry in the United States extensively uses industrial technologies to raise livestock, which have negative health effects, such as obesity, diabetes, salmonella infections, and environmental pollution.

Shooting process

Michael Boillon wrongly seeks to find, and it's all Paplen, who says in the film that the industrial practice of confining livestock "relies on the addition of antibiotics to feed, leading to some diseases that are resistant to antibiotics." Several large meat companies in the United States refused to allow film crews to film their production processes. Some of the livestock facilities featured in the film were secretly photographed by workers working there. The screen shows that Jin super attack full of wide Li will also Huang, those farms are narrow space. Carol Morrison, a Maryland farmer, agreed to the crew's request to film the show. Footage shows her chickens dying or falling ill before being shipped to market. Morrison says the situation is partly due to antibiotics in the feed that increase the weight of livestock eggs rapidly. The film mentions a farm that supplies a large supermarket chain. Mr. Kim would like to add a commentary to the film, saying that the farm produces organic products because there is a market demand. [7]

Food company(Total 4 photos)The "inside story" documented in the documentary "Food, Inc." made many people feel "shocking," and anger against the modern food industry was reignited. It is not actually a "science documentary" but a crusade against the capitalist mode of production. But for a variety of reasons, viewers seem to be less concerned about "capitalism" and more concerned about using this documentary to judge what they should eat and what they should not eat.

Political and economic issues aside, the documentary begins by pointing out that the way food is produced and processed has changed more than it has in the past 10,000 years, with the subtext that "change is bad." This subtext misses the point: science and technology are advancing faster and faster, with more changes in almost every field than in the past 10,000 years. In fact, change is not the problem, the problem is whether the change brings good or bad things to people. But the film avoids that. When it comes to food, many people go for "nature." The problem is that agricultural production itself is an "unnatural" activity.

Another emotional point of the film is industrial chicken farming, and if the film is talking about "animal welfare," these claims would be powerful. But on the issue of food, it is only necessary to discuss whether such chicken is "nutritious", "harmful", "how much to sell". "Food, Inc." has no intention of answering these questions. Once again, the producer conveys his "idea" through "sensationalism." Once the audience accepts the sensationalism, it often ignores what should be basic common sense.

Food company(3 photos in total)Of course, the modern food industry itself is not without problems, but what society needs is how to solve concrete problems, not simple opposition. "Food, Inc." may not be much of a problem when it is merely used as a critique of capitalism, but it is not an appropriate tool for probing the mysteries of the dinner table.(Review by The Beijing News)

The film combines the aesthetics of film with the serious topic of food through meaningful images, sarcastic dialogue and clever techniques. The two main characters, Schlawse and Pollan, take the audience into the unknown "food hell". But Joe Salatine also brings hope to the film, showing the audience how normal legal means can save American agriculture and people's poor digestive system. The film needs a passionate and logical mind like Salatine's to look at the many facets of the problem.

Food Insider exposes problems in the food industry at a variety of levels, from the weak regulatory capabilities of the U.S. Department of Agriculture to who gets key positions in government for businesses and agricultural executives. But what really touches the heart of the film is the way it tells the story of a huge food industry in an intimate, personal way. Let people realize that the consumption of food is really a multiple choice. (Sina Entertainment Review) [9]