What do you mean "relevant content"? Simply put, if you can use a ", "to connect the term name and the directory name, then the directory is related content. For example, the author of the Analects, the main content of the Analects, and so on, are all related to the Analects.
For example, the content of the TV drama "Daming Palace words" in the entry of "Daming Palace" is not relevant. You can not say "Daming Palace words is Daming Palace XX".

On the basis of correlation, there is the problem of "too low correlation". There are several cases, let's talk about them separately.

The first kind is [excessively long content].
Encyclopedia is an encyclopedia, not a four-library encyclopedia. What's the difference between these two things?
What is the Siku book? He copied all the books in the world at that time and produced a large book of more than 30,000 volumes. It is very complete, but you ask, "What does the Analects talk about?" It won't answer you. You'll have to read it yourself.
Encyclopedia is different, it is not about rich information, but to answer those questions that people are most concerned about. Who wrote the Analects of Confucius? What are the main ideas? How did it get passed down? Let's wait. On the contrary, the content of the original text is not of concern to everyone, only those who want to study it well will use the original text.
Another example, a "Princess Huanzhu" TV drama entry, clear the main plot, plot characters, ratings influence and so on is almost, there is no need to write every line of each episode in the entry, there is no need for each TV station every time the record is recorded in this.
Because encyclopedia this thing, is to do a general understanding of people who do not understand, if you want to deeper research, you need to look up professional information, just look at the encyclopedia is not enough. That's why we encourage references in entries.

Writing the full text of the Analects in the Analects entry, and writing all the playback records in the Huanzhu Gege entry, these are [too lengthy content], and writing in the entry will make the entry long and painful to read.
How do you solve this problem? When you want to add a large paragraph, be sure to think, is this paragraph better than none? Try to avoid listing a lot of content in an entry.

Second, [relevant unimportant content].
For another example, it is reasonable for me to write an entry on "Song Dynasty" to introduce the territory, economy, important events, imperial lineage, etc., but there is a catalog that says "Kite of Song Dynasty" is [relevant unimportant content]. Song Dynasty kites are related to the Song Dynasty, but I know that Song Dynasty kites will hardly affect my understanding of "Song Dynasty", and I will not specifically say how Song Dynasty kites are when I introduce "What is Song Dynasty" to others.
In a similar situation, a small company in Wuxi City is not suitable for introduction in the "Wuxi" entry or "company" entry, a brand of a certain model of mobile phone is not suitable for introduction in the "mobile phone" entry and so on. This kind of place is particularly prone to malicious editors to advertise.

If your content does not pass for this reason, then you do not need to try, it is not suitable for this entry. If you must write, do so in a truly relevant article. "Song Dynasty kite" is written into the "kite" entry, a brand of a certain model of mobile phone is written into the mobile phone's own entry, stuffed into other entries to fill in what chaos.

Third, the content of the relationship is too distant.
It's time for a new chestnut. When I write "Jay" entry, it is ok to write that he has a famous work "blue and white porcelain", but if I want to write the creation background of blue and white porcelain, this belongs to the "relationship is too far content".
The theme of this paragraph (the background of the creation of Blue and white Porcelain) is too far from the theme of the entry (Jay Chou)! If this were to be written into "Jay Chou", then Jay Chou's entry would be full of the creation background of each of his songs, the early promotion of each concert, and the credits of each movie, such an entry would be impossible to read.

In general, the level of content introduced in the entry (like "Jay Chou") should not exceed two levels (Jay Chou - important work - "Blue and White porcelain"). The second level of content (" Blue and White Porcelain ") only needs an overview, and does not need a detailed subtopic description (" Blue and White porcelain "- lyrics, lyrics explanation, creative background, etc.). Content more than two levels away (Jay Chou - important work - "blue and White porcelain" - creation background) is considered to be too far away content.
For example, the introduction of the wife of the founder Mark Zuckerberg in the "Facebook" entry (Facebook - founder - Mark Zuckerberg - wife), the participation experience of the actor Chen Xiaoxu in the "Lin Daiyu" entry (Lin Daiyu - actor - Chen Xiaoxu - participation experience), etc., are far relationship content that should not be written into the entry.

This content is treated in the same way as the previous article and is not suitable for this entry. If you must write, do so in a truly relevant article.

Thank you for reading and I hope I can help you.
If after reading the above content found your version don't really have the above said to the mistake, you can appeal: http://help.baidu.com/newadd?prod_id=10&category=2.